Saturday, October 29, 2016
How is it that anyone ever goes to hell? How could a loving and merciful God send anyone there? How could any sin be grave enough to merit eternal damnation? How could it be that not merely a handful of people, but a great many people, end up in hell, as most Christian theologians have held historically?
Friday, October 21, 2016
While we’re on the subject of mind-body interaction, let’s take a look at Frank Jackson’s article on Karl Popper’s philosophy of mind in the new Cambridge Companion to Popper, edited by Jeremy Shearmur and Geoffrey Stokes. Popper was a dualist of sorts, and Jackson’s focus is on the role Popper’s “World 3” concept and the issue of causal interaction played in his critique of materialism.
Recently I announced my intention not to renew my membership in the Society of Christian Philosophers (SCP) in light of SCP President Michael Rea’s statement distancing the SCP from a talk on traditional sexual morality given by Prof. Richard Swinburne at an SCP conference. (I’ve discussed the controversy generated by this statement here and here.) More recently I called attention to Prof. Swinburne’s public statement on the matter. I have been asked if I have changed my mind in light of Swinburne’s statement. The answer is No, I have not.
Wednesday, October 19, 2016
An update on the SCP controversy, about which I have blogged recently (here, here, and here). I have been in communication with Prof. Richard Swinburne, who has kindly offered “thanks for the support which you have given to me personally and to everyone concerned that the SCP should welcome lectures and papers from those defending traditional Christian morality.” Prof. Swinburne informs me that he has prepared a public statement on the controversy. Since readers of this blog will naturally find such a statement of interest, I offered to post it here. Here it is:
Saturday, October 15, 2016
David Oderberg’s new paper “Further clarity on cooperation and morality” appears in the Journal of Medical Ethics. See also his guest post at the Journal of Medical Ethics blog.
A talk by Oderberg on the theme “The Great Unifier: Form and the Unity of the Organism” can be viewed at YouTube.
Oderberg was recently named as one of the top 50 most influential living philosophers.
Friday, October 14, 2016
Monday, October 10, 2016
It has been two weeks or so since the controversy over Richard Swinburne and the Society of Christian Philosophers (SCP) erupted. I’ve got nothing to add to what I and many others have already said, except this: I will not be renewing my membership in the SCP. I quit. Goodbye. Other SCP members will have to make up their own minds about how best to react to the situation, but I would encourage them to leave as well. In my judgment, the SCP no longer deserves the financial and moral support of Christian philosophers.
Saturday, October 8, 2016
New Scientist magazine opines that metaphysics has much to contribute to the study of nature. Part of a special issue on the theme.
On the other hand, at Nautilus, empiricist philosopher of science Bas van Fraassen tells scientists to steer clear of metaphysics.
As usual, Aristotle had the answer long before you thought of the question. His little known treatise on internet trolling.
Slurpee cups. Marvel Treasury Editions. Gerber’s Howard the Duck. Hostess fruit pie ads. Claremont and Byrne’s X-Men. Secret Wars. Crisis on Infinite Earths… If you’re of a certain age, you know what I’m talkin’ about. At Forces of Geek, George Khoury discusses his new book Comic Book Fever: A Celebration of Comics 1976 to 1986.
Tuesday, October 4, 2016
My article “Aquinas and the problem of consciousness” appears in the anthology Consciousness and the Great Philosophers, edited by Stephen Leach and James Tartaglia and just published by Routledge. Lots of interesting stuff in this volume. The table of contents and other information are available here.
Saturday, October 1, 2016
Christina van Dyke is the Executive Director of the Society of Christian Philosophers (SCP), whose President, Michael Rea, recently issued a statement on Facebook disavowing a talk defending traditional Christian sexual morality given by Richard Swinburne at an SCP conference. Rea’s critics argue that his action has politicized the SCP insofar as it has, in effect, officially distanced the Society from the traditionalist side of the dispute over sexual morality and given an SCP endorsement to the liberal side. I have argued that Rea owes Swinburne an apology, and a group of philosophers is now petitioning the SCP for an apology.